...by sacrificing it for editing tags on DA.
I'd say, the tag system is probably the first really cool improvement in navigation on DA in all time that I have been here (more than 7 years). It works! I have found a lot of art that I was interested in. And I enjoy (and use) the references to tagged collections of favorites.
Of course, the system needs further improvements. I think, either DA should establish certain policy on how to properly tag pictures, or they have to support tag synonyms. Say, currently nudeelf, elfnude, nude_elf, nakedelf, nudenakedelf, nudeelves, etc. are all different tags, and they give different results in browsing. What is not good
(Though, you already could get an idea of what I was looking for).
Also, the DA programmers were extremely generous by automatically adding tags to absolutely all "deviations" that previously had keywords. By this questionable decision they drew attention of the curious public... to all ancient crap that I had moved to scraps and forgotten long ago. So, well, it took 2 days to edit tags on all my good drawings and to remove tags from all my not so good scraps and WIPs.
I tagged my collections - that's cool!
I got puzzled. With all that glory of tagging, why can't one set tags for galleries and subgalleries??? Honestly, it would be many times more useful than tagging collections. I am less interested in what other people find here. I am more interested in promotion of my artworks and in watching WHAT I want, not WHOM I want. This relates to both "deviants" and groups. In many cases I would not like to watch the whole group, but I would like to watch certain folders from that group.
So, why not?
Also, why we have no means to easily select a tag that we want to "explore"? Why can't we use a list of tags? Etc, etc, etc...
HOORAY!!! IT WORKS!!!